AG-2026.02-075·gr-qc
Reissner Nordstrom black holes with integrable singularity interiors supported by string distributions
Authors
- Milko Estrada
Abstract
The Reissner Nordstrom (RN) black hole is characterized by two well known pathologies: a central singularity and an inner horizon associated with instabilities and a potential loss of predictability. In this work, we show that the RN exterior geometry can arise from an interior spacetime containing an integrable singularity but no inner horizon. In this scenario, tidal forces remain finite near the origin, allowing nondestructive radial infall, while the conventional description in terms of a pointlike mass is replaced by an extended matter distribution. To illustrate this possibility, we provide explicit realizations of such an interior region based on string distributions, namely a cloud of strings (CS) and a newly defined fluid of strings (FS). While the standard cloud of strings model leads to a divergence in the conserved energy associated with timelike Killing vectors, the proposed FS model can be interpreted as a geometrically screened version of the string cloud distribution and admits configurations that, when extended to infinity, describe black holes with finite conserved energy. Physical consistency between the interior region and the RN exterior geometry requires the continuity of temperature across the interface, implying thermal equilibrium between the two regions, while discontinuities in the tangential pressure can signal gravitational phase transitions. These results determine the physical conditions under which string based interior distributions can consistently generate the RN exterior geometry and clarify the circumstances under which phase transitions at the event horizon may arise.
Submitted
3 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.03050
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.