AG-2026.02-1005·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-ex
Searches for Extra Higgs Bosons using $t\bar{t}+$Higgs{$(\to b\bar b)$} Events within 2HDMs: Direct versus Indirect Probes
Authors
- Esteban Chalbaud
- Stefania De Curtis
- Luigi Delle Rose
- Atri Dey
- Stefano Moretti
- Antonio Onofre
Abstract
We study the possibility of establishing the production of additional Higgs states in the process $gg,q\bar q\to t\bar t Φ$, where $Φ$ = $H_{2,3}$, with $H_2$ being CP-even and $H_3$ being CP-odd, at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), by solely exploiting the kinematic features of the reconstructed $t\bar t$ system. We adopt as reference theoretical framework a generic CP-Conserving 2-Higgs Doublet Model (2HDM), which also accommodate a Standard Model (SM)-like Higgs state $H_1$. We show that the masses $m_{H_{2,3}}$ exhibit clear correlations with the $t\bar{t}$ system properties and could, in principle, be extracted from these. Moreover, the CP properties of the $H_{2,3}$ states can be determined, even when both states are produced simultaneously. We then compare the results produced using this method with those obtained from a full kinematic reconstruction of the $H_{2,3}$ decays in the most studied $b\bar b$ channel (we take $m_{H_{2,3}}< 2m_t$), thus proving the superiority of the approach here proposed. This paves the way to both the discovery and characterization of additional Higgs states produced {\sl inclusively} in association with top-antitop quark pairs, thereby dispensing of the complications intrinsic to the {\sl exclusive} reconstruction of such states from their decay products. We test this by establishing the sensitivity of our approach in the case of a Composite 2HDM (C2HDM), describing the Higges as pseudo-Nambu Goldstone Bosons (pNGBs) and naturally predicting Higgs mass spectra in the range of sensitivity of the described analysis.
Submitted
4 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.04511
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.