AG-2026.02-1263·physics.ins-det·cross-listed: hep-exhep-ph
Detector-level assessment of alternative target nuclei for CEvNS experiments under realistic experimental conditions
Authors
- Yusuf Havvat
Abstract
Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering (CEvNS) provides a sensitive probe of neutrino interactions at low momentum transfer, but its experimental observation is strongly constrained by detector-related effects such as energy threshold, resolution, noise, and event-selection criteria. In this work, we perform a detector-level assessment of CEvNS nuclear recoil observability under realistic experimental conditions, with particular emphasis on the role of detector response in shaping measurable recoil spectra. Using detailed Geant4-based simulations, CEvNS interactions are modeled for a set of alternative target nuclei spanning light to intermediate mass ranges. The true nuclear recoil energy distributions are propagated through a simplified yet realistic detector-response chain incorporating energy smearing, noise-induced fluctuations, threshold cuts, and veto-based event selection. We present a systematic analysis of recoil energy spectra before and after detector effects, response matrices linking true and reconstructed energies, and energy-dependent selection efficiencies. The results demonstrate that detector response effects significantly modify the observable CEvNS signal, particularly in the near-threshold region where most recoil events are concentrated. Differences in efficiency turn-on behavior and reconstructed energy distributions highlight the target-nucleus dependence of CEvNS observability under identical detector conditions. Rather than focusing on absolute event-rate predictions, this study emphasizes the relative impact of detector effects on signal accessibility and target performance. The presented framework provides a consistent methodology for evaluating and comparing prospective CEvNS target materials at the detector level, offering practical guidance for future low-threshold CEvNS experiments and detector design optimization.
Submitted
20 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.22234
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.