AG-2026.02-1370·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exhep-lat
Kaons ($K^\pm$) in hot and dense QCD
Authors
- K. Azizi
- G. Bozkır
- N. Er
- A. Türkan
Abstract
We present a systematic QCD sum-rule analysis of the in-medium properties of the charged kaon doublet $K^{\pm}$ over the full $(T,ρ)$ plane relevant to current and forthcoming heavy-ion experiments. Working within the QCD sum-rule framework and incorporating temperature-and density-dependent quark, gluon, and mixed condensates, we derive Borel-transformed sum rules for the effective masses $m_{K^{\pm}}$, the pseudoscalar decay constants $f_{K^{\pm}}$, and the vector self-energy $Σ_{v}$ of both charged states simultaneously. Our vacuum results, $m_{K^{-}} = 494.6^{+4.9}_{-6.9}$~MeV and $f_{K^{-}} = 157.3^{+4.1}_{-2.9}$~MeV (with near-degenerate $K^{+}$ values), are in excellent agreement with Particle Data Group values at the sub-percent level. In the medium, $m_{K^{\pm}}$ decreases monotonically with increasing baryon density and temperature, signalling progressive partial restoration of chiral symmetry. A pronounced mass splitting $Δm = m_{K^{-}} - m_{K^{+}}$ develops in baryonic matter, driven by the opposite sign of the Weinberg--Tomozawa vector interaction for the two charge states; it reaches $|Δm| \sim 0.35$~GeV near $ρ\simeq 3.2\,ρ_{\rm sat}$ at $T = 0$ and is partially quenched by thermal fluctuations. A central outcome of this study is the extraction of the critical onset density $ρ_c$, defined as the threshold beyond which the in-medium modifications of $K^{-}$ properties signal the onset of the transition toward the chirally restored phase. We stress that $ρ_c(T)$ should not be interpreted as a precise determination of the QCD critical point-a task beyond the reach of any current effective framework-but rather as an indicator ....
Submitted
27 February 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.24170
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.