AG-2026.02-246·astro-ph.HE·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.IMastro-ph.SRgr-qc
Measurement prospects for the pair-instability mass cutoff with gravitational waves
Authors
- Matthew Mould
- Jack Heinzel
- Sofia Alvarez-Lopez
- Cailin Plunkett
- Noah E. Wolfe
- Salvatore Vitale
Abstract
Pair-instability supernovae leave behind no compact remnants, resulting in a predicted gap in the distribution of stellar black-hole masses. Gravitational waves from binary black-hole mergers probe the relevant mass range and analyses of the LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA catalog (GWTC-4) indicate a possible mass cutoff at $40$-$50\,M_\odot$. However, the robustness of this result remains unclear. To this end, using full Bayesian parameter estimation, we simulate gravitational-wave catalogs with and without such a mass cutoff, then test whether its presence or absence is correctly inferred with parametric population models. For catalogs similar to GWTC-4, confident identification of a cutoff is not guaranteed, but the best constraints among our simulations are compatible with results from GWTC-4 when the model includes a cutoff. Conversely, spurious identification of a cutoff is unlikely. For catalogs expected by the end of the O4 observing run, uncertainty in the cutoff mass is reduced by $\gtrsim20\,\%$, but a cutoff at 40-50$M_\odot$ yields only a lower bound on the $^{12}\mathrm{C}(α,γ)^{16}\mathrm{O}$ reaction rate, our most stringent constraints on the S-factor at $300\,\mathrm{keV}$ being $S_{300}\gtrsim125\,\mathrm{keV}\,\mathrm{b}$ at $90\,\%$ credibility. Relative uncertainties on the Hubble parameter $H_0$ from gravitational-wave data alone can still be up to $100\,\%$. We also analyze GWTC-4 with the nonparametric PixelPop population model, finding that some mass features are more prominent than in parametric models but a sharp cutoff is not required. However, the parametric model passes a likelihood-based predictive test in GWTC-4 and the PixelPop results are consistent with those from our simulated catalogs with a cutoff. Such tests are necessary to make astrophysical claims from gravitational-wave catalogs.
Submitted
11 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.11282
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.