AG-2026.02-600·hep-th·cross-listed: math-ph
Verlinde lines, anyon permutations and commutant pairs inside $E_{8,1}$ CFT
Authors
- Naveen Balaji Umasankar
- Arpit Das
Abstract
We develop a defect-theoretic refinement of meromorphic 2d CFTs in which the ordinary torus partition function -- often just the vacuum character -- does not reveal how states organize under symmetry lines. Our central proposal is an \emph{equatorial projection} framework: from a commutant decomposition into commuting rational chiral algebras with categories $\mathcal{C}$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{C}}$, we encode genus-one couplings by a non-negative integer matrix $M$ pairing characters and satisfying modular intertwiner relations. Invertible topological defect lines act directly on this gluing data (Verlinde lines diagonally via $S$-matrix eigenvalues, and anyon-permuting lines by braided-autoequivalence permutations), making modular covariance of defect amplitudes automatic and sharply distinguishing insertions that yield genuine modular invariants from those defining consistent non-holomorphic interfaces. We further show that the \emph{replacement rules} of \cite{Hegde:2021sdm, Lin:2019hks} arise as equatorial projections of defect actions, and we extend these constructions beyond two-character examples by systematically treating three-character commutant pairs in the $E_{8,1}$ theory. The unique $c=8$ meromorphic CFT $E_{8,1}$ serves as a universal testbed, producing new defect partition functions and clarifying the roles of $\mathrm{Pic}(\mathcal{C})$ and $\mathrm{Aut}^{\mathrm{br}}(\mathcal{C})$. Finally, we outline extensions to higher central charges (e.g.\ $c=32,40$), yielding modular-invariant non-meromorphic theories beyond the $c=24$ Schellekens landscape \cite{Schellekens:1992db} as defect/interface descendants of meromorphic parents.
Submitted
2 February 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2602.02700
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.