AG-2026.03-106·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-th
Non-minimally coupled loop quantum inflation with inverse-volume corrections
Authors
- Rudranil Roy
- Giovanni Otalora
- Joel Saavedra
- Salvatore Capozziello
Abstract
We study slow-roll inflation driven by a scalar field non-minimally coupled to gravity within the effective framework of Loop Quantum Cosmology (LQC), including inverse-volume corrections. We consider two physically motivated classes of potentials, a Higgs-like quartic potential $V\proptoφ^{4}$ and string-inspired fractional monomial potentials $V\proptoφ^{p}$ with $p<1$. Working at first order in the slow-roll expansion, we derive analytic expressions for the inflationary observables, namely the scalar spectral index $n_s$, the tensor-to-scalar ratio $r$, and the running $α_s\equiv dn_s/d\ln k$, and then solve the corrected background dynamics numerically to obtain quantitative predictions. Confronting these results with current observational constraints from Planck 2018 and ACT DR6, we find that the model can lie within the allowed region of the $(n_s,r,α_s)$ parameter space, including a mild preference for slightly larger $n_s$, as suggested by recent ground-based measurements. We also compute the probability of achieving sufficient slow-roll inflation in this setting. Although effective LQC replaces the initial singularity with a nonsingular quantum bounce, the likelihood of a sufficiently long inflationary phase depends on the pre-inflationary dynamics and on the inflaton potential. Using the canonical Liouville measure on the effective phase space, we determine the fraction of post-bounce trajectories that yield sufficient inflation and find that the non-minimal coupling parameter $ξ$ substantially enlarges the phase-space volume of favorable initial conditions relative to the minimally coupled case, exhibiting an attractor-like enhancement that saturates at large $ξ$.
Submitted
4 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.04182
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.