AG-2026.03-1120·math-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.stat-mechhep-thnlin.SIquant-ph
On the integrability structure of the deformed rule-54 reversible cellular automaton
Authors
- Chiara Paletta
- Tomaž Prosen
Abstract
We study quantum and stochastic deformations of the rule-54 reversible cellular automaton (RCA54) on a 1+1-dimensional spatiotemporal lattice, focusing on their integrability structures in two distinct settings. First, for the quantum deformation, which turns the model into an interaction-round-a-face brickwork quantum circuit (either on an infinite lattice or with periodic boundary conditions), we show that the shortest-range nontrivial conserved charge commuting with the discrete-time evolution operator has a density supported on six consecutive sites. By constructing the corresponding range-6 Lax operator, we prove that this charge belongs to an infinite tower of mutually commuting conserved charges generated by higher-order logarithmic derivatives of the transfer matrix. With the aid of an intertwining operator, we further prove that the transfer matrix commutes with the discrete-time evolution operator. Second, for the stochastic deformation, which renders the model into a Markov-chain circuit, we investigate open boundary conditions that couple the system at its edges to stochastic reservoirs. In this setting, we explicitly construct the non-equilibrium steady state (NESS) by means of a staggered patch matrix ansatz, a hybrid construction combining the previously used commutative patch-state ansatz for the undeformed RCA54 with the matrix-product ansatz. Finally, we propose a simple empirical criterion for detecting integrability or exact solvability in a given model setup, introducing the notion of digit complexity.
Submitted
26 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.25424
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.