AG-2026.03-1130·math-ph·cross-listed: hep-lathep-thquant-ph
Critical curve of two-matrix models $ABBA$, $A\{B,A\}B$ and $ABAB$, Part I: Monte Carlo
Authors
- Carlos I. Pérez Sánchez
Abstract
For a family of two-matrix models \[ \frac{1}{2} \operatorname{Tr}(A^2+B^2) - \frac{g}{4} \operatorname{Tr}(A^4+B^4) - \begin{cases} \frac{h}{2} \operatorname{Tr}( A BA B) \\ \frac{h}{4} \operatorname{Tr}( A BA B+ ABBA ) \\ \frac{h}{2} \operatorname{Tr}( A B BA ) \end{cases} \] with hermitian $A$ and $B$, we provide, in each case, a Monte Carlo estimate of the boundary of the maximal convergence domain in the $(h,g)$-plane. The results are discussed comparing with exact solutions (in agreement with the only analytically solved case) and phase diagrams obtained by means of the functional renormalization group.
Submitted
26 March 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.25715
Summary
Researchers used Monte Carlo simulations to map out where three types of two-matrix models remain mathematically well-behaved, finding boundaries that match known exact solutions and predictions from renormalization group theory.
- The study identifies the 'critical curve'—the edge of the region where these matrix models converge—for three different interaction patterns between matrices A and B.
- Monte Carlo estimates agree with the one case that has been solved exactly, suggesting the numerical method is reliable for the unsolved cases.
- The results validate predictions from functional renormalization group theory, a different mathematical approach, bridging two independent ways of analyzing these systems.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.