AG-2026.03-1152·cond-mat.str-el·cross-listed: hep-th
Reflections on time-reversal in the Symmetry Topological Field Theory
Authors
- Lea E. Bottini
- Nick G. Jones
Abstract
Symmetry under time-reversal appears in the microscopic description of many physical systems. In a quantum mechanical setting it acts as an anti-unitary operator, so does not fall under general analyses based on unitary symmetries. In classifying zero temperature phases of matter in (1+1)d lattice models, the role of anti-unitary symmetries is, however, well-understood. In recent years, the Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) approach to this classification has given a general framework to understand symmetries as topological defects, but does not naturally include anti-unitary symmetries. Following recent proposals in the literature, we adopt a symmetry-enriched SymTFT for a theory with both internal and time-reversal symmetry. In particular, we take a standard SymTFT associated with an internal unitary symmetry that is then enriched by a background time-reversal symmetry. A detailed analysis of the topological boundary conditions of this enriched SymTFT allows us to characterize the corresponding (1+1)d gapped phases that preserve the enriching symmetry (i.e. those that do not spontaneously break this symmetry in the ground state). Line operators in the SymTFT approach are related to non-local string-order parameters (with charged end-point operators) for SPT phases. These are subtle in the anti-unitary case and we explore them both on the lattice and in the continuum. We include an analysis of unitary string order parameters that reveal the Klein bottle SPT invariant. On the lattice, we show that the correct end-point charge coincides with the time-reversal-charge only when the end-point operator is hermitian.
Submitted
27 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.26884
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.