AG-2026.03-1178·quant-ph·cross-listed: cond-mat.stat-mechhep-th
Genuine and Non-Genuine Quantum Non-Markovianity: A Unified Information-Theoretic Review
Authors
- Rajeev Gangwar
- Ujjwal Sen
Abstract
Understanding whether the features of open quantum dynamics are genuinely quantum remains a central challenge in quantum dynamics. Even though the non-Markovian behavior of quantum dynamics has been widely investigated across different settings, there is still no consensus on which properties of a dynamics reflect genuine quantum features and which arise from classical or non-genuine quantum sources. In this review, we provide detailed information on recent developments in characterizing quantum non-Markovianity based on information backflow and the nature of its origin. We also present a survey on how various approaches separate classical and quantum contributions, as well as how they define operational tasks that reveal genuine quantum non-Markovianity. We analyze several frameworks, including state-distinguishability -based, channel-based (``CP-divisibility''), and process-tensor methods. For each framework, we outline the underlying physical motivation, the criteria proposed to distinguish genuine quantum non-Markovianity from practical or apparent memory effects. We further compare different approaches and their strengths and limitations. The review aims to clarify the conceptual and operational aspects of quantum non-Markovian processes based on their nature and to provide a foundation for future research on quantum non-Markovianity and its role in advancing quantum information science and technology.
Submitted
30 March 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.28277
Summary
This review sorts through competing definitions of 'genuine' quantum memory effects, explaining which arise from truly quantum phenomena versus classical sources, with implications for quantum information processing.
- Quantum systems can 'remember' past interactions (non-Markovianity), but researchers disagree on whether this memory is authentically quantum or merely reflects how we measure it—a distinction that matters for designing quantum technologies.
- The review compares three major frameworks (state-distinguishability, channel-divisibility, and process tensors) for detecting and characterizing these memory effects, each with different strengths for different practical tasks.
- Clarifying what counts as genuine quantum memory versus classical or observational artifacts is essential for reliably harnessing quantum effects in applications like quantum communication and computation.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.