AG-2026.03-1194·cond-mat.str-el·cross-listed: hep-thmath-phmath.CT
Categorical Time-Reversal Symmetries
Authors
- Rui Wen
- Sakura Schafer-Nameki
Abstract
The classification of phases using categorical symmetries has greatly expanded the landscape of gapped and gapless phases. So far, however, these developments have largely been restricted to phases with unitary (higher-)categorical symmetries over $\mathbb{C}$. In this work, we incorporate anti-unitary symmetries, such as time-reversal symmetry $\mathbb{Z}_2^T$, and show that the relevant physical structures are naturally described by fusion categories over $\mathbb{R}$. A class of real fusion categories, which we call Galois-real fusion categories, provides the correct categorical model for anti-unitary symmetries. A simple example is the time-reversal symmetry $\mathbb{Z}_2^T$ itself. We discuss the basic structures of real fusion categories and present a range of examples, including the group-theoretical categories $(G^T)^ω$ and $\mathsf{Rep}(G^T)$ associated to anti-linear groups $G^T$, as well as non-invertible time-reversal symmetries described by a real analogue of Tambara--Yamagami fusion categories. We then classify gapped phases enriched with anti-linear symmetries in terms of module categories over Galois-real fusion categories. We furthermore apply the categorical formulation to prove dualities (i.e. gauge or Morita equivalences) of anti-linear symmetries generated by gauging subgroups. Complementing this, we also develop a Symmetry Topological Field Theory (SymTFT) framework, in which Galois-real fusion categories arise as boundary conditions of a $\mathbb{Z}_2^T$-enriched SymTFT. Morita equivalent anti-linear symmetries are shown to arise as different boundaries of the same $\mathbb{Z}_2^T$-enriched SymTFT.
Submitted
30 March 20263 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.28720
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.