AG-2026.03-1243·hep-ph
Light-cone sum rules with $B$-meson distribution amplitudes for the $B\to p$ form factors in $B$-mesogenesis models
Authors
- Aritra Biswas
- Alexander Khodjamirian
- Ali Mohamed
Abstract
New decay modes of $B$-meson into a baryon and invisible dark antibaryon $Ψ$ are among the most distinctive signatures of the $B$-mesogenesis scenario. We concentrate on the proton mode and consider two versions of the underlying interaction of $Ψ$ with quarks, the so-called models $(d)$ and $(b)$. To estimate the width of the $B^+\to p Ψ$ decay, we obtain the $B^+\to p$ transition form factors, applying QCD light-cone sum rules (LCSRs) with $B$-meson distribution amplitudes with an accuracy up to twist-5, while interpolating the proton with a current. This method is independent of the previously applied one, which was based on the nucleon distribution amplitudes. We estimate the partial width of the $B^+\to p Ψ$ decay as a function of the dark antibaryon mass. Furthermore, we use the ratio of this width to the inclusive $B\to X_N Ψ$ width, the latter predicted earlier using the heavy quark expansion method. This ratio, which is independent of the effective coupling, when combined with the minimal inclusive branching fraction of $O(10^{-4})$, necessary for the feasibility of $B$-mesogenesis, yields lower limits on the $B^+\to p Ψ$ branching fraction. We confront these limits with the most recent upper bounds obtained from BaBar and Belle/Belle II searches for the decays of $B^+$-meson into a proton and missing energy. The comparison indicates that experimental upper bounds on the branching fraction of $B\to p Ψ$ at the level of $10^{-8}-10^{-7}$ are needed for a decisive probe of this invisible mode of $B$ decays.
Submitted
2 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.01723
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.