AG-2026.03-133·gr-qc
Accretion Disk Perturbations and Their Effects on Kerr Black Hole Superradiance and Gravitational Atom Evolution
Authors
- Ruiheng Li
- Zhong-hao Luo
- Zehong Wang
- Fa Peng Huang
Abstract
Kerr black hole (BH) superradiance can form gravitational atoms and produce characteristic gravitational-wave signals, providing a probe of ultralight bosons and dark matter. In realistic systems, accretion-disk gravity can shift energy levels and mix states, modifying the effective superradiant growth. We model the disk as a weak external perturbation via a multipole expansion and derive an effective three-level Hamiltonian for the $n=2$ subspace $\{\ket{211},\ket{210},\ket{21-1}\}$ in the weak-coupling regime. The leading disk effect is the quadrupolar ($\ell_d=2$) tidal field, whose symmetries fix the selection rules: axisymmetry gives only diagonal shifts, equatorial nonaxisymmetry activates $Δm=\pm2$ mixing ($\ket{211}\leftrightarrow\ket{21-1}$), and breaking equatorial reflection opens $Δm=\pm1$ couplings involving $\ket{210}$. As illustrations, a transient equatorial $m=2$ spiral wave drives the resulting two-level system and can suppress or quench superradiance by populating a decaying mode, while a quasi-static warp produces full three-level mixing and can generate narrow ``growth gaps'' near accidental near-degeneracies, with the same static reshuffling also allowing enhancement when weight shifts toward the growing mode. These findings demonstrate that accretion disk perturbations are a crucial environmental factor in determining the dynamics of BH superradiance and the evolution of boson clouds, thereby providing a more reliable theoretical basis for assessing the detectability of ultralight bosons in realistic astrophysical settings.
Submitted
5 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.05182
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.