AG-2026.03-1431·astro-ph.HE·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-ph
Sensitivity to Axion-like Particle dark matter with very-high-energy gamma-ray observations of Active Galactic Nuclei located behind Galaxy Clusters
Authors
- Cervane Grimaud
- Denys Malyshev
- Emmanuel Moulin
Abstract
Axion-Like-Particles (ALPs) are hypothetical pseudo-scalar particles actively searched as light dark matter candidates. The coupling of ALPs to photons can give rise to distinctive spectral features in the observed gamma-ray spectrum of astrophysical sources. We perform a forecast study on the sensitivity to ALP-photon interactions using stacked mock observations of selected active galactic nuclei (AGNs) located behind galaxy clusters (GC). The ALP-photon conversion in the magnetic fields of galaxy clusters give rise to absorption-like features in AGN spectra that are subject to large variance in their prediction for individual sources. We consider here a stacking analysis of multiple AGN-cluster pairs, which yields a more controlled prediction of the expected ALP-induced spectral patterns in the observed gamma-ray spectra. Using realistic mock observations of selected Fermi-LAT AGNs by ongoing Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes such as H.E.S.S., MAGIC and VERITAS, we provide a careful assessment of the expected sensitivity of a combined statistical analysis of many AGN-GC pairs, together with the impact of modelling and instrumental uncertainties. The sensitivity reaches ALP-photon couplings down to 6$\times$10$^{-13}$ GeV$^{-1}$ for an ALP mass of 3$\times$10$^{-8}$ eV, and is currently statistically dominated indicating further improvements from more observations. Such a stacking analysis approach enables exploration of the yet-uncharted ALP dark matter parameter space in the 10$^{-8}$ - 10$^{-7}$ eV mass range.
Submitted
12 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.12009
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.