AG-2026.03-149·gr-qc
Energy Extraction and Particle Acceleration in String-Inspired Rotating Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion Black Hole
Authors
- Arindam Kumar Chatterjee
Abstract
We study energy extraction and particle acceleration in the rotating Einstein-Maxwell-Dilaton-Axion (EMDA) black hole, focusing on the impact of dilaton hair $b\le 0$ on near-horizon energetics relative to Kerr. For the Penrose process we derive analytic expressions for the maximum efficiency and show that negative $b$ can strongly enhance the ideal gain in the extremal regime (e.g., reaching $\sim 91\%$ for $b=-0.3$). We then compute the irreducible mass $M_{\rm irr}$ and the corresponding rotationally extractable energy $\mathcal{E}_{\rm rot}\equiv M-M_{\rm irr}$, finding that $M_{\rm irr}$ decreases monotonically as $b$ becomes more negative while $\mathcal{E}_{\rm rot}$ increases, indicating a larger spin-energy reservoir; at extremality the extracted share from rotation is $\mathcal{E}_{\rm rot}/M\simeq 0.63$ for EMDA, reducing to the Kerr value $\simeq 0.29$ at $b=0$. Kinematic constraints relevant to fragment production are quantified via the Wald and Bardeen--Press--Teukolsky bounds, which are progressively relaxed for more negative $b$. For wave superradiance we obtain the flux balance and the amplification window $0<β<kΩ_H$, with $Ω_H$ expressed through $Ξ=r_H^{2}+2br_H+a^{2}$; negative $b$ modifies $Ω_H$ and enlarges the parameter region exhibiting negative horizon flux. Finally, we analyse two-particle collisions and derive $E_{\rm cm}$, showing that the Bañados--Silk--West divergence persists at the horizon when one particle is tuned to the critical angular momentum $L_c=E/Ω_H$, while $E_{\rm cm}$ remains finite for generic angular momenta. Overall, dilaton hair in EMDA simultaneously amplifies energy-extraction channels and reshapes the near-horizon thresholds governing high-energy collisions.
Submitted
6 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.06273
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.