AG-2026.03-162·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
All $2D$ generalised dilaton theories from $d\geq 4$ gravities
Authors
- Johanna Borissova
Abstract
We demonstrate that generic two-dimensional Horndeski theories can arise from the reduction of pure gravities in $d \geq 4$ dimensions, and therefore generic onshell configurations for the two-dimensional metric and scalar field correspond to genuine $d$-dimensional gravitational vacuum solutions. We discuss separately the two-dimensional Horndeski theories which can arise from the reduction of $d$-dimensional generally covariant gravitational actions built only from curvature invariants without covariant derivatives and possessing second-order equations of motion on $2 + (d-2)$ warped-product backgrounds. The discussion is subsequently extended to generic $d$-dimensional gravitational actions with this latter property. We establish a Birkhoff theorem for all gravitational theories whose reduction yields an integrable two-dimensional Horndeski theory, in which case static spherically symmetric solutions satisfy $g_{tt} g_{rr} = -1$ in Schwarzschild gauge whereby the metric function $g_{tt} = -f$ is determined by an algebraic equation. We therefore propose to refer to all such theories as quasi-topological gravities. These results can be used to show in reverse that any $d$-dimensional static spherically symmetric and asymptotically flat spacetime satisfying $g_{tt} g_{rr} = -1$ in Schwarzschild gauge with an invertible dependence of $f$ on the ADM mass can be reconstructed explicitly as a vacuum solution to a $d$-dimensional gravitational theory. We discuss examples of regular black holes such as the Bardeen spacetime, which could not be obtained from polynomial and non-polynomial quasi-topological gravities involving only curvature invariants without covariant derivatives.
Submitted
6 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.06786
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.