AG-2026.03-1710·astro-ph.GA·cross-listed: astro-ph.COhep-ph
Set the Night on FIRE: Building an Empirical Local Dark Matter Velocity Distribution
Authors
- Xiuyuan Zhang
- Andreas Thoyas
- Lina Necib
- Andrew Wetzel
- Arpit Arora
Abstract
The majority of terrestrial direct detection experiments for Dark Matter (DM) rely on the Standard Halo Model (SHM), which assumes the local DM velocity distribution follows a Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution. However, galaxy mergers can deposit DM that remains kinematically clustered today, inducing deviations from the smooth SHM prediction. Previous studies have suggested that the local stellar velocity distribution may serve as a tracer for DM populations originating from the same progenitor systems. In this work, we systematically investigate how merger mass and accretion time affect the correlation between local stellar and DM velocity distributions in Milky Way-like galaxies from the FIRE-2 simulations. We find a strong correlation between traceable DM components and their stellar counterparts, with the tightest correspondence arising from lower-mass mergers accreted at earlier cosmic times. For the remaining DM that lacks an identifiable stellar counterpart, which dominate the full DM fraction, we find that its velocity distribution is well described by a component-wise generalized Gaussian. Combining these two ingredients, we reconstruct the full local DM velocity distribution. This framework captures merger-induced features-such as co-rotation of accreted material with the galactic disk-that are entirely absent in the SHM. Finally, we propagate uncertainties through the reconstruction and show that they are dominated by the stellar mass-halo mass relation, which is unlikely to improve substantially in the near term. We therefore argue that this framework approaches the current limit of our ability to characterize the local DM velocity distribution.
Submitted
26 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.25783
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.