AG-2026.03-323·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: gr-qchep-ph
Three-band dark-siren cosmology with intermediate-mass black hole binaries: synergy of Taiji, LGWA, and Einstein Telescope
Authors
- Ji-Yu Song
- Yue-Yan Dong
- Shang-Jie Jin
- Si-Ren Xiao
- Jing-Fei Zhang
- Xin Zhang
Abstract
Gravitational-wave (GW) dark sirens provide an independent probe of the cosmic expansion history. Their cosmological constraining power, however, depends critically on precise luminosity-distance measurements and sky localizations for cross-matching with galaxy catalogs. Multiband GW observations can track GW events across different frequency bands and thus improve both. Motivated by this, we forecast the cosmological potential of intermediate-mass black hole binaries (IMBHBs) observed by a three-band GW detector network composed of Taiji (TJ), the Lunar Gravitational-wave Antenna (LGWA), and the Einstein Telescope (ET). We simulate detectable IMBHB populations and analyze them with a hierarchical Bayesian dark-siren framework that includes galaxy-catalog completeness and redshift uncertainties. We find that the TJ-LGWA-ET network outperforms all two-detector configurations considered here. In the $Λ$CDM model, it constrains the Hubble constant and matter density to $\sim 0.12\%$ and $\sim 0.6\%$, respectively. In the $w$CDM model, a 4-year dark-siren sample alone constrains the dark-energy equation-of-state parameter $w$ to $\sim 2.7\%$. Adding baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and Type Ia supernova (SNe Ia) data improves the $w$ constraint to $\sim 2.1\%$, slightly better than that from the current CMB+BAO+SNe Ia combination. We also show that the final constraints remain sensitive to IMBHB population assumptions and galaxy-catalog limitations, which highlights the need for deep galaxy surveys with precise redshift measurements.
Submitted
13 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.13080
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.