AG-2026.03-380·nucl-th·cross-listed: astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph
Sensitivity of neutron star observables to microscopic nuclear parameters of realistic equations of state
Authors
- Nikolas Cruz-Camacho
- Carlos Conde-Ocazionez
- Veronica Dexheimer
- Jacquelyn Noronha-Hostler
- Nicolás Yunes
Abstract
The equation of state of matter at supranuclear densities governs the astrophysical observables of neutron stars. A realistic, though complex, description is provided by the Chiral-Mean-Field model, which depends on many microscopic nuclear-physics parameters. We present a Fisher-information-inspired analysis of the sensitivity of neutron-star observables to the parameters of the Chiral-Mean-Field model at $β$-equilibrium using SLy as a crust. We then compute neutron-star sequences and extract masses, radii, compactnesses, and tidal deformabilities. From the logarithmic derivatives of these observables with respect to each nuclear parameter, we construct a dimensionless, Fisher-inspired sensitivity matrix and perform a principal-component analysis to identify the effective combinations of nuclear parameters that most strongly affect neutron-star observables. Although the ranking depends mildly on the observable, the three most important nuclear parameters are the vacuum value of the dilaton field $χ_0$ (which sets the overall scale of the scalar potential and trace-anomaly contribution), the scalar singlet strength $g_{1}^X$ (which controls the overall scalar attraction through the baryon effective masses), and the $k_0$ quadratic scalar term (which governs the curvature of the scalar potential). This framework provides a reproducible, data-driven approach to quantify parameter sensitivities in dense-matter models and to guide future Bayesian inference of nuclear information from multi-messenger astrophysical observations.
Submitted
16 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.16019
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.