AG-2026.03-447·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.HEphysics.comp-ph
Observational imprints and quasi-Periodic oscillations of magnetically charged anti-de Sitter black holes
Authors
- Faizuddin Ahmed
- Mohsen Fathi
- Ahmad Al-Badawi
Abstract
In this work, we investigate observable signatures of a magnetically charged Anti-de Sitter black hole in string-inspired Euler-Heisenberg theory. We analyze photon trajectories, the photon sphere, and the resulting black hole shadow. We derive the photon sphere and shadow radii and show that both deviate from the Schwarzschild and Schwarzschild-AdS cases. In particular, the radii decrease monotonically as the magnetic charge parameter $Q_m$ increases, indicating that magnetic charge modifies light propagation near the black hole. We also study neutral and charged particle motion and compute the corresponding epicyclic frequencies. Using the effective potential method, we obtain the specific energy and angular momentum for stable circular orbits and determine the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO). The presence of $Q_m$ shifts the ISCO radius and alters the orbital structure. The radial, vertical, and orbital frequencies show clear deviations from the Schwarzschild case. Finally, we confront the model with twin-peak quasi-periodic oscillation (QPO) data from stellar-mass, intermediate-mass, and supermassive black hole candidates. A two-dimensional Delta chi-square analysis in the ($r$, $Q_m$) space shows that the best fit corresponds to $Q_m=0$, although finite values remain allowed within confidence levels. At the 1 sigma level, we obtain an upper bound $Q_m/M$ less than about 0.2. These results indicate that while magnetic charge produces measurable theoretical deviations, current QPO data place only moderate constraints on its magnitude.
Submitted
19 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.19458
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.