AG-2026.03-455·gr-qc
Modeling the merger-ringdown of an eccentric test-mass inspiral into a Kerr black hole using the effective-one-body framework
Authors
- Guglielmo Faggioli
- Alessandra Buonanno
- Maarten van de Meent
- Gaurav Khanna
Abstract
We characterize and phenomenologically model the merger-ringdown of gravitational waves emitted by a small compact object that plunges and merges into a Kerr black hole from equatorial-eccentric inspirals. The waveforms are generated employing a time-domain Teukolsky code sourced with trajectories computed using the effective-one-body framework. We span values of the Kerr spin $a\in[-0.9, 0.9] $, eccentricity at the last stable orbit (LSO) $ e_{\rm LSO} \in [0,0.9] $, and relativistic anomaly $ ξ_{\rm LSO} \in [0 , 2 π]$. We characterize the last peak of the waveform and ringdown features across the parameter space, finding that the eccentricity mainly affects the last peak features, while it has a smaller impact on the ringdown signal. In contrast, the relativistic anomaly measured at the LSO influences the morphology of the last peak in a restricted portion of the parameter space and has no impact on the ringdown part. We perform the analysis for all the spin-weighted spherical harmonic modes normally included in the $\texttt{SEOBNR}$ family of models, $(\ell,m)\in\{ (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (5,5), (2,1), (3,2), (4,3)\}$. Finally, we introduce a merger-ringdown model for $\texttt{SEOB-TMLE}$, a forthcoming inspiral-merger-ringdown waveform model for eccentric spin-aligned binary black holes in the test-mass limit, whose features can be extended to comparable-mass regimes. The model also accounts for quasinormal mode mixing during the ringdown. It provides a first step toward incorporating the impact of residual eccentricity close to merger into spin-aligned effective-one-body merger-ringdown models for binary black holes.
Submitted
20 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.19913
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.