AG-2026.03-497·gr-qc·cross-listed: hep-thquant-ph
Entanglement degradation in regular and singular spacetimes
Authors
- Orlando Luongo
- Stefano Mancini
- Sebastiano Tomasi
Abstract
We study entanglement degradation near the horizons of regular, Reissner-Nordström, and Schwarzschild-de Sitter black holes, considering the Bardeen, Hayward, and generalized Hayward metrics as regular black holes. To this end, we compute the entanglement negativity, $\mathcal{N}$, for two Unruh-like modes of a scalar field shared by Alice, who is inertial, and Rob, who hovers at a fractional offset $ρ$ outside the horizon of the backgrounds under consideration. For each geometry, we locally approximate the metric by a Rindler patch characterized by Rob's proper acceleration $a_0$. Because this Rindler approximation breaks down near the extremal limit, we also compute a near-extremal cutoff. Tracing over the inaccessible Rindler wedge yields a mixed Alice-Rob state, from which we evaluate $\mathcal{N}$ as a function of the mode frequency $ω$ and the acceleration $a_0$. In all geometries considered, except for one, $\mathcal{N}$ increases monotonically with the parameter distinguishing that geometry form the Schwarzschild one. The exception is the Reissner-Nordström metric, for which $\mathcal{N}$ exhibits a shallow local minimum at a particular value of the charge. We also find that the Reissner-Nordström metric is the only background for which the negativity falls below that of the Schwarzschild case. Among all cases studied, the Schwarzschild-de Sitter spacetime provides the strongest protection of entanglement. Finally, across all backgrounds, high-frequency modes undergo less degradation than low-frequency modes. These results suggest that entanglement may serve as a useful probe for distinguishing Schwarzschild spacetime from other geometries.
Submitted
23 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.21857
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.