AG-2026.03-517·gr-qc
Thermodynamic constraints and future singularities in Unimodular Gravity driven by phantom and non-phantom fluids
Authors
- Norman Cruz
- Samuel Lepe
- Guillermo Palma
- Miguel Cruz
Abstract
This work investigates future cosmological singularities in a flat FLRW universe filled with a single barotropic fluid, ($p = (γ- 1)ρ$), within the framework of unimodular gravity. In this setting, the non-conservation of the energy-momentum tensor is encoded through an energy diffusion function $Q$. While a constant diffusion term leads to an effective cosmological constant and preserves adiabatic evolution, a time-dependent $Q(t)$ induces non-adiabatic dynamics. We consider a power-law Ansatz for $Q$ as a function of the redshift and impose the condition of positive entropy production. This requirement leads to non-trivial constraints on the model parameters, with direct implications for the admissible singularity structure. In particular, within the thermodynamically allowed sector, we show that Big Rip singularities are excluded for non-phantom fluids when the cosmological constant is positive. For phantom fluids, the model reproduces the expected Big Rip behavior, as well as Big Crunch solutions for negative cosmological constant. More importantly, we show that diffusion can induce an effective phantom regime even when the fundamental fluid is non-phantom. In particular, for a negative cosmological constant, we present an explicit realization of a Big Rip singularity in unimodular gravity driven by diffusion, while consistently preserving a non-phantom equation of state and positive entropy production. These results reveal a novel mechanism for the emergence of future singularities, with no direct analogue in standard General Relativity.
Submitted
24 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.22749
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.