AG-2026.03-532·gr-qc·cross-listed: astro-ph.HE
Radial Oscillations of Viscous Stars
Authors
- Lennox S. Keeble
- Jaime Redondo-Yuste
Abstract
Oscillation modes of neutron stars, a key target for third-generation gravitational wave detectors, encode key information about their constituent nuclear matter. In this work, we study the effect of viscosity on oscillations of cold, polytropic, spherically symmetric neutron stars. We focus on purely radial oscillations and work perturbatively to linear order within two hydrodynamic frameworks: the acausal covariant generalization of the Navier-Stokes equations proposed by Eckart, and the causal generalization formulated by Bemfica, Disconzi, Noronha, and Kovtun (BDNK). We find that viscosity damps the radial modes on millisecond timescales and induces fractional shifts in the oscillation frequency which increase both with the compactness and viscosity of the star, reaching up to the percent level for the fundamental mode with bulk viscosities $ζ\sim10^{30}\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{cm}/\mathrm{s}$. For more viscous stars, the oscillation frequency decreases, becoming zero (i.e., an overdamped mode) for $ζ\gtrsim10^{31}\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{cm}/\mathrm{s}$. We also study the linear threshold of gravitational collapse. Consistent with recent analytic results in the small viscosity regime, we find that viscosity in Eckart theory cannot stabilize an unstable inviscid star. We provide numerical evidence that viscosity in BDNK theory is similarly unable to prevent gravitational collapse, but it slightly modifies the threshold of collapse. Overall, our results advance our understanding of the impact of viscosity on the oscillation modes of neutron stars, a key component of viscous asteroseismology with next-generation gravitational wave detectors.
Submitted
24 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.23622
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.