AG-2026.03-910·hep-th·cross-listed: cond-mat.str-elmath.CT
On the SymTFTs of Finite Non-Abelian Symmetries
Authors
- Oren Bergman
- Jonathan J. Heckman
- Max Hübner
- Daniele Migliorati
- Xingyang Yu
- Hao Y. Zhang
Abstract
The $(D+1)$-dimensional symmetry topological field theory (SymTFT$_{D+1}$) of a $D$-dimensional absolute quantum field theory (QFT$_D$) provides a topological characterization of symmetry data. In this framework, the SymTFT comes equipped with a physical boundary specifying a relative QFT, and a topological boundary which specifies the global form of symmetries. In general, there need not be a unique bulk theory which encodes this information but it is often helpful to have a more manifest presentation of symmetries in terms of bulk degrees of freedom. For the case of a finite non-Abelian symmetry group $G$, the bulk SymTFT may be described by a Dijkgraaf-Witten TFT with gauge group $G$. This makes manifest the ``electric'' presentation of the symmetry data but can obscure some of the magnetic data as well as non-Abelian structure present in the absolute QFT$_D$ such as symmetry operators which cannot fully detach from the topological boundary. We address these issues for 3D SymTFTs by constructing discrete BF-like theory Lagrangians for finite groups which admit a presentation as an extension by a finite Abelian group and a finite (possibly non-Abelian) group. This enables us to give a streamlined approach to reconstructing the fusion rules of the accompanying Drinfeld center, but also allows us to construct surface-attaching non-genuine line operators associated directly with non-Abelian group elements rather than just their conjugacy classes. We also sketch how our treatment generalizes to higher-dimensional SymTFTs.
Submitted
12 March 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2603.12323
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.