AG-2026.04-048·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Cosmological Wavefunctions as Amplitudes: Dual Shuffle Factorization and Uniqueness from New Hidden Zeros
Authors
- Yang Li
- Laurentiu Rodina
Abstract
We show that cosmological wavefunctions in $φ^n$ theories naturally generalize flat-space $\mathrm{Tr}(φ^3)$ scattering amplitudes: via a simple map from tube variables to Mandelstam invariants, each wavefunction coefficient $ψ_{\mathcal{G}}$ becomes an on-shell amplitude-like object $\mathcal{A}_G$ associated with a generating graph $G$. At tree level these objects coincide with the Cachazo-He-Yuan construction based on Cayley functions that generalizes Parke-Taylor factors. We uncover new graph-based hidden zeros that extend and unify all known cosmological zeros. Based on this zero structure, we uncover a factorization principle dual to unitarity. Instead of factorization across poles, $A\to A_L\times A_R$, a zero at $p_{a\in G_L}\!\cdot\! p_{b\in G_R}=0$ factorizes the generating graph, $G\to G_L\times G_R$, and is equivalent to the shuffle decomposition $\mathcal{A}_G=\mathcal{A}_{G_L}\unicode{x29E2}\mathcal{A}_{G_R}$. Near-zero factorization is a simple consequence of this new structure. Using dual factorization, we show that locality together with the full set of hidden zeros uniquely fixes tree-level cosmological wavefunctions without assuming unitarity. We show that these zeros are equivalent to special enhanced large-$z$ behavior under Britto-Cachazo-Feng-Witten (BCFW) shifts, extending the zeros--BCFW correspondence beyond flat-space amplitudes. We also find evidence for further extensions of the zero structure and loop-level uniqueness. Our results show that cosmology provides a natural arena for on-shell methods and even reveals new structure in flat-space amplitudes.
Submitted
1 April 20263 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.01133
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.