AG-2026.04-1105·hep-ph
LFV decays in a 3-4-1 model with minimal inverse seesaw neutrinos
Authors
- N. H. T. Nha
- L. T. Hue
- L. T. T. Phuong
- T. T. Hong
Abstract
We investigate an extended 3-4-1 model consisting of a new singly charged Higgs boson, implementing the minimal inverse seesaw mechanism to accommodate the large values of the $(g-2)_{e,μ}$ anomalies as well as the lepton-flavor-violating decay rates of charged leptons, the Standard Model-like Higgs boson, and the $Z$ boson, all consistent with current experimental data. Unlike the previously studied 3-4-1 realization, the model considered here predicts strong correlations among these observables that can be tested in future experiments. In particular, the current upper bound on Br$(τ\to μγ)$ imposes a stringent constraint compatible with the $1σ$ experimental range of $(g-2)_μ$, corresponding to a maximal deviation of $10^{-9}$ from the SM prediction. The forthcoming experimental sensitivity to Br$(τ\to μγ)$ will reduce this deviation to $5\times 10^{-10}$.
Submitted
9 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.08444
Summary
A modified particle physics model with extra Higgs bosons and neutrino physics explains why electrons and muons appear slightly heavier than theory predicts, while predicting testable correlations between different rare particle decays.
- The model connects the mysterious excess mass of muons and electrons (the g-2 anomalies) to rare decays where one lepton transforms into another, something the Standard Model forbids.
- Unlike earlier versions, this model makes strong predictions linking these seemingly separate phenomena, so measuring one tells you about the others—a key test of whether the theory is right.
- Future experiments searching for tau leptons decaying to muons could cut the predicted deviation in half, providing a crucial way to either confirm or rule out this extended theory.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.