AG-2026.04-1114·nucl-ex·cross-listed: hep-phnucl-thphysics.atom-ph
Towards better nuclear charge radii
Authors
- István Angeli
- Dimiter L. Balabanski
- Paraskevi Dimitriou
- Dipti
- Kieran T. Flanagan
- Georgi Georgiev
- Mikhail Gorchtein
- Paul Gùeye
- Fabian Heiße
- Andreas Knecht
- Kei Minamisono
- Wilfried Nörtershäuser
- Ben Ohayon
- Natalia S. Oreshkina
- B. K. Sahoo
- Hunter Staiger
- Endre Takacs
- Xiaofei Yang
- Deyan T. Yordanov
Abstract
Nuclear charge radii constitute a physical observable of growing significance across multiple subdisciplines of physics and related fields. Their determination relies on a combination of complementary experimental techniques and advanced theoretical frameworks. Current recommended values are informed by the outcomes of several independent working groups, each employing distinct methodological approaches and evaluation strategies. The present effort is directed toward a more precise and reliable extraction of charge radii, as well as the development of a modern, transparent, and methodologically robust compilation of recommended values.
Submitted
10 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.08985
Summary
Physicists are creating a more accurate and standardized method for measuring nuclear charge radii—the physical size of atomic nuclei—by synthesizing results from different experimental approaches into a unified, transparent database.
- Nuclear charge radii matter across physics: they constrain tests of fundamental forces, help calibrate atomic clocks, and reveal how protons cluster inside nuclei.
- Different experimental techniques (muonic atoms, electron scattering, laser spectroscopy) give slightly different answers; this work reconciles them into one reliable set of values.
- A transparent, modern compilation replaces older ad-hoc methods, making it easier for other scientists to trust and use these measurements in their own research.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.