AG-2026.04-1121·hep-ph
Threshold Top-Quark Pair-Production: Cross Sections and Key Uncertainties
Authors
- Maria Vittoria Garzelli
- Giovanni Limatola
- Sven-Olaf Moch
- Matthias Steinhauser
- Oleksandr Zenaiev
Abstract
We study theoretical uncertainties in predicting top-quark pair-production near threshold at the LHC using the non-relativistic QCD framework. We include variations in the top-quark mass and width, the strong coupling $α_s$, renormalization and factorization scales, and parton distribution functions, as well as uncertainties from the color-singlet and octet Green's functions that describe quasi-bound toponium formation. These uncertainties are compared with those from standard fixed-order QCD predictions, and implications for ATLAS and CMS analyses are discussed. For the LHC at 13 TeV center-of-mass energy, the integral of the top-quark pair invariant-mass distribution from 340 to 350 GeV is 11.67 pb with ${}^{+1.43}_{-1.47}$ pb uncertainty. The corresponding excess after subtracting the POWHEG-BOX result is 4.15 pb with the same uncertainties.
Submitted
10 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.09485
Summary
Physicists calculated how precisely they can predict top-quark pair production near the energy threshold where they just barely form, accounting for multiple sources of theoretical uncertainty in their calculations.
- The non-relativistic QCD framework (used when particles move slowly enough that quantum effects dominate) gives significantly different predictions than standard methods, with a 4 pb excess that could indicate missing physics or calculation refinement.
- The main uncertainties come from unknown parameters like the top mass and the strength of the strong force, as well as subtle quantum effects in how pairs interact—together they create about ±12% uncertainty in the final prediction.
- This work matters for LHC experiments because understanding top-quark production at threshold could reveal new particles or interactions, but only if theorists can nail down their baseline prediction first.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.