AG-2026.04-1133·nucl-th·cross-listed: hep-phnucl-ex
Complementary Approach to Anisotropic Flows in Heavy-Ion Collisions
Authors
- E. Dlin
- O. Teryaev
Abstract
We introduce a no-reaction-plane (no-RP) method for extracting directed (\(v_1\)) and elliptic (\(v_2\)) flows in heavy-ion collisions, which eliminates the need for event-plane reconstruction. %by scanning over fixed test angles and using simple count asymmetries. The method is validated with PHSD model simulations of Au+Au collisions at \(\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 9.2\) GeV at freeze-out (impact parameter \(b = 4\) fm). We demonstrate that the two asymmetries for each harmonic contribute equally, i.e., \(\langle A_{\mathrm{ud}}^2\rangle \approx \langle A_{\mathrm{lr}}^2\rangle\) and \(\langle A_1^2\rangle \approx \langle A_2^2\rangle\), so that a single asymmetry measurement suffices for a good flow estimate. Event-by-event comparisons with direct calculations using the true reaction plane yield Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.985 for \(v_2\) and 0.883 for \(v_1\), confirming that the no-RP method captures flow fluctuations well enough.
Submitted
12 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.10620
Summary
Physicists developed a simpler way to measure the directional patterns of particles created in heavy-ion collisions without needing to reconstruct the collision's reaction plane, achieving high accuracy.
- The new 'no-reaction-plane' method measures flow by counting particle asymmetries along test directions, avoiding computational overhead of traditional event-plane reconstruction.
- Different asymmetry measurements give redundant information (contributing equally), so experimentalists need only one, simplifying analysis without sacrificing precision.
- Computer simulations show the method captures individual collision variations with 98.5% correlation to exact calculations for elliptic flow, validating its practical use.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.