AG-2026.04-1153·hep-ex·cross-listed: hep-phnucl-ex
SemiCharmTag: a tool for Semileptonic Charm tagging
Authors
- Carolina Arata
- Imanol Corredoira
- Alisha Lightbody
- Michael Winn
Abstract
A method for selecting and/or rejecting leptons from charm semileptonic decays based on the tagging of the secondary vertex using a hadron track is introduced. The method is developed for dimuon Drell-Yan measurements in LHCb using full simulations in proton-proton collisions at $\sqrt{s}=13.6$ TeV. We focus on the invariant mass range between 2.9 and 5 GeV/$c^2$ with single muon transverse momentum larger than 1 GeV/$c$. A novel strategy is detailed for background rejection, achieving an improvement of the signal over background of a factor $\sim 4$ at an efficiency of 81% with minimal bias on the Drell-Yan signal properties. Moreover, a second approach is presented for the construction of unbiased background-pure samples of single muons from charm decays, achieving a charm efficiency of 21.4% at a Drell-Yan efficiency of 1.1%.
Submitted
13 April 20262 months ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.11574
Summary
Physicists developed a technique to identify muons produced by charm-quark decays in particle collisions by analyzing the tracks left by other particles at the decay point, improving signal clarity by a factor of four.
- The method uses secondary vertex information (where charm decays occur) to separate genuine charm-decay muons from background noise, crucial for precision measurements of Drell-Yan processes at the LHC.
- One approach achieves 81% efficiency at a 4× improvement in signal-to-background ratio, while a second creates pure charm samples for calibration, trading efficiency for cleaner background understanding.
- This matters because Drell-Yan measurements—which probe fundamental electroweak physics—are sensitive to charm contamination; better tagging reduces systematic uncertainties in precision tests of the Standard Model.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.