AG-2026.04-1187·hep-ph
A new approach to dark photon
Authors
- Jie Tang
- Pei-Hong Gu
Abstract
Over the past few decades, the hypothetically dark photon has been extensively studied from both phenomenological and experimental perspectives. It should be noted that the local symmetry for dark photon does not gauge the standard model Higgs scalar and chiral fermions. In this paper, we show that an artificially introduced $U(1)_X$ gauge group for dark photon and the standard model $U(1)_Y$ gauge group for hypercharge can be simultaneously born from two $U(1)_1\times U(1)_2$ gauge groups under which the standard model scalar and fermions carry the same $U(1)_1$ and $U(1)_2$ charges without causing any gauge anomalies. We further introduce a spontaneously broken mirror symmetry between the $U(1)_1$ and $U(1)_2$ gauge groups so that the $U(1)_1$ and $U(1)_2$ gauge couplings can acquire a small difference at one-loop level and hence the $U_X \times U_Y$ kinetic mixing can be highly suppressed in a natural way.
Submitted
15 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.13818
Summary
Physicists propose a new theoretical framework where dark photons arise naturally from fundamental symmetries, with their interactions to ordinary matter automatically suppressed—solving a long-standing fine-tuning problem.
- Dark photons (hypothetical particles related to dark matter) usually require artificial assumptions; this work derives them from more fundamental gauge symmetries that treat the Higgs and fermions democratically.
- A mirror symmetry between two underlying gauge groups naturally suppresses the interaction strength between dark and ordinary photons, avoiding the need for hand-tuned small parameters.
- The framework avoids anomalies (mathematical inconsistencies in quantum field theory), making it a consistent foundation for future dark photon searches.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.