AG-2026.04-1200·hep-ph
Logarithmic EW corrections at two-loop
Authors
- J. M. Lindert
- L. Mai
Abstract
We present the implementation of next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) electroweak (EW) virtual corrections at next-to-leading logarithmic (NLL) accuracy in the amplitude generator OpenLoops. The implementation covers the automated computation of processes involving massless fermions and transversely polarised vector bosons. For energies above the EW scale, logarithmic EW corrections are strongly enhanced in the tails of kinematic distributions of key LHC processes, reaching several tens of percent at NLO and several percent at NNLO. The two-loop implementation is validated against analytical results from the literature. We present phenomenological results for representative LHC processes and discuss the role of two-loop EW corrections in reducing theoretical uncertainties from missing higher-order contributions.
Submitted
15 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.14320
Summary
Physicists have added precise two-loop electroweak corrections to OpenLoops, a tool for calculating particle collision probabilities at the LHC, showing these corrections can shift predictions by tens of percent in extreme collision scenarios.
- The new calculations capture 'logarithmic' electroweak effects—corrections that grow large at high energies—at the highest practical accuracy level (NNLO), enabling more reliable LHC predictions.
- These two-loop corrections matter most in the tails of measurement distributions (rare, extreme events), where they can cause 10–50% shifts depending on the process and accuracy level.
- Validating against known analytical results and showing concrete LHC examples demonstrates the tool is ready for precision physics, helping experimenters distinguish genuine new particles from theoretical uncertainty.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.