AG-2026.04-1201·hep-ph
Wave-envelope dark matter beyond the monochromatic paradigm
Authors
- Yechan Kim
- Hye-Sung Lee
Abstract
Ultralight dark matter searches widely assume that signals are monochromatic, with a single frequency set by the mass. This assumption is generally violated in the presence of field mixing, even when the constituent fields have similar frequencies. Instead, dark matter signals can exhibit a two-timescale structure with intrinsic slow modulation. We demonstrate that mixing between ultralight wave dark matter fields induces a parametric structure, leading to a scenario we refer to as wave-envelope dark matter, in which a slow-beating envelope emerges alongside the primary oscillation. This results in distinctive features such as slow modulation and characteristic sideband structures in the frequency spectrum, beyond the conventional monochromatic expectation. As a representative example, we briefly discuss implications for neutrino observables.
Submitted
15 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.14480
Summary
When ultralight dark matter fields mix together, they produce signals with a slow-beating envelope pattern rather than a single pure frequency, creating distinctive sidebands that current searches might miss.
- Dark matter searches typically assume single-frequency 'monochromatic' signals, but field mixing creates a two-timescale structure with slow modulation overlaid on fast oscillations.
- This wave-envelope effect produces characteristic sideband patterns in frequency space—like ripples around the main signal—that could be a smoking gun for detecting mixed dark matter fields.
- The result challenges experimental search strategies designed for simple monochromatic targets and suggests redesigning detectors to look for these slower beating patterns alongside primary oscillations.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.