AG-2026.04-1233·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.CO
Thermal effects on Dark Matter production during cosmic reheating
Authors
- Marco Drewes
- Yannis Georis
- Mubarak A. S. Mohammed
- Sebastian Zell
Abstract
The relic abundance of Dark Matter (DM) produced via thermal freeze-in is sensitive to the thermal history during and after cosmic reheating. In minimal models, this opens up the possibility to make predictions for collider observables by combining the requirement to match the DM relic abundance with observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). We assess the impact of thermal corrections to the rate of cosmic reheating and the rate of thermal DM production on CMB observables and the relic abundance. We find that such corrections are generally small in the regime where they can be computed by means of finite-temperature field theory. We construct counter-examples where this general rule is violated.
Submitted
17 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.16085
Summary
Thermal effects during the early universe's reheating phase slightly alter how much dark matter survives to today, but these corrections are usually small enough not to significantly change predictions for what we should see in particle colliders or the cosmic microwave background.
- The team calculated how quantum thermal corrections affect dark matter freeze-in—the process where dark matter particles stop being produced as the universe cools—and found these effects are typically negligible in calculable regimes.
- This negative result is useful: it means physicists can trust simpler models that ignore thermal corrections when predicting dark matter abundance from collider experiments and CMB data.
- The authors identified rare counter-examples where thermal corrections do matter significantly, flagging scenarios where the simplified approach breaks down and more careful calculations become necessary.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.