AG-2026.04-1241·astro-ph.CO·cross-listed: hep-phnucl-th
A data-driven prediction for the primordial deuterium abundance
Authors
- Timothy Launders
- Cara Giovanetti
- Hongwan Liu
Abstract
We predict the primordial deuterium abundance using a novel, fully data-driven approach, where we use Gaussian process regression to fit experimental nuclear reaction data for $d$,($d$,$n$)$^3$He, $d$,($d$,$p$)$t$, and $d$($p$,$γ$)$^3$He, three reactions to which the primordial deuterium abundance is most sensitive. Using the Planck determination of the baryon density, we predict $10^5\times\mathrm{D/H} = 2.442\pm0.040$ in standard Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, $1.70σ$ below the Cooke et al. measurement. Our result is consistent with predictions relying on first principles calculations of the deuterium burning cross sections. With the inferred baryon density from a combined fit to Planck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G D1, this discrepancy worsens to $1.98σ$. We validate our approach and confirm that Gaussian processes make unbiased D/H predictions with appropriately-sized uncertainties. We repeat our validation tests for low-degree polynomial fits, a technique used in previous analyses, and find that they systematically over-predict D/H. Our results highlight the need for improved measurements of the $d$,($d$,$n$)$^3$He and $d$,($d$,$p$)$t$ S-factors at energies between 0.1 and 0.6 MeV.
Submitted
17 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.16600
Summary
Using machine-learning fits to nuclear reaction data, researchers predicted the primordial deuterium abundance from the Big Bang and found it 1.7 sigma below the observed value—suggesting either new physics or that old nuclear-physics measurements need refinement.
- The team replaced traditional polynomial fitting with Gaussian process regression, a machine-learning method that makes fewer assumptions about the underlying data and avoids systematically overestimating deuterium predictions.
- Their prediction (D/H = 2.442 ± 0.040 × 10⁻⁵) falls slightly but significantly short of astronomical observations, hinting at a real tension between Big Bang nucleosynthesis theory and measurement that deserves investigation.
- The mismatch points to specific nuclear reactions (deuterium-deuterium collisions) that need remeasuring at low energies, providing experimentalists with a concrete target to resolve this discrepancy.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.