AG-2026.04-1254·hep-ph
Entropy and mean multiplicity from dipole models in the high energy limit
Authors
- Krzysztof Kutak
- Sándor Lökös
Abstract
The 1D Mueller dipole model, its high energy limit, and its generalization were investigated. To address the ambiguity stemming from different definitions of the pseudorapidity ranges in experimental measurements, we propose the entropy as the function of the logarithm of the average multiplicity, $S(\ln\langle n\rangle$, as a universal observable. From the solutions of the models, we calculate both the entropy and the average charged particle multiplicity and compare to data measured in proton-proton collisions. We obtained these quantities directly from the measured charged particle multiplicity distributions and determine the model parameters via fits. We find that the generalized dipole model provides a significantly better description of the data than the 1D Mueller model.
Submitted
19 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.17418
Summary
Physicists tested theoretical models of particle production in high-energy collisions by comparing entropy and particle counts to real data, finding that a generalized dipole model outperforms simpler versions.
- The dipole model—a framework for understanding how particles spray out when protons collide—can be tested using entropy as a universal yardstick that doesn't depend on how experimentalists define measurement regions.
- When researchers fit the generalized dipole model to actual proton-collision data, it matches both the entropy and the average number of particles produced much better than the standard Mueller dipole model.
- This work bridges theory and experiment by showing how abstract particle-production models can be validated against real measurements, helping physicists refine their understanding of the extreme-energy regime.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.