AG-2026.04-1261·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exnucl-thquant-ph
Polarization, Maximal Concurrence, and Pure States in High-Energy Collisions
Authors
- Yu-Xuan Liu
- Luo-Ting He
- Bo-Wen Xiao
Abstract
We establish a quantitative relation between local spin polarization and quantum entanglement in two-qubit systems by deriving an upper bound on the concurrence at fixed local polarization, showing that increasing polarization constrains the maximum achievable entanglement. We further demonstrate that this bound is saturated by pure states in certain cases. As a concrete physical application, we consider the parity-violating process $e^+e^- \to Z^0 \to q\bar{q}$, which generates final-state spin polarization. We show that the maximal concurrence is attained in specific kinematic regions and is significantly reduced relative to the unpolarized case. These results establish a general, process-independent framework connecting local polarization, maximal entanglement, and the role of pure states.
Submitted
20 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.17756
Summary
Researchers prove that when particles become more polarized (spinning preferentially in one direction), their quantum entanglement with each other must decrease, and they identify exactly which quantum states achieve this maximum entanglement.
- High spin polarization and quantum entanglement are in tension: the paper quantifies this trade-off mathematically, showing polarization acts as a constraint that reduces the maximum possible entanglement between two particles.
- Pure quantum states (the most 'pure' form of quantum information, before any measurement) can saturate this theoretical limit in certain configurations, revealing a deep structure in quantum mechanics.
- In real particle collisions at high energies, the asymmetry created by parity violation naturally produces polarization that reduces entanglement compared to symmetric unpolarized cases—a measurable signature in experiments.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.