AG-2026.04-132·astro-ph.HE·cross-listed: gr-qc
Implications of low neutron star merger rates for gamma-ray bursts, r-process production and Galactic double neutron stars
Authors
- Maya Fishbach
- Alexander P. Ji
- Wen-fai Fong
- Tom Y. Wu
- Jillian C. Rastinejad
- Aditya Vijaykumar
- Hsin-Yu Chen
Abstract
The first multimessenger discovery of a binary neutron star (BNS) merger, GW170817, proved that such mergers can source short gamma-ray bursts (SGRBs) and produce \rprocess elements. The initial merger rate from this single event in the first two observing runs of the LIGO-Virgo observatory network, $110$--$3840\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, was found to be broadly consistent with the SGRB rate, the Milky Way (MW) r-process mass, and the Galactic population of double neutron star (DNS) systems that will merge in a Hubble time. However, only one additional BNS merger has been detected since, and the BNS merger rate has been consistently revised downwards with the past few gravitational wave (GW) catalog updates. Analyzing GW data from the latest catalog GWTC-4, we find a total BNS merger rate of $28$--$300\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\,\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ (consistent with the most recently published values from LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA) consisting of $53^{+176}_{-49}\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$ in GW170817-like $\sim(1.3,1.3)\,M_\odot$ BNSs (90\% credibility). In light of this updated GW rate, we revisit the consistency of the BNS merger rate with SGRBs, r-process and Galactic DNSs. In all cases, there is an emerging tension with the BNS (and EM-bright neutron star--black hole, NSBH) merger rate. Comparing to a BNS merger rate of $100\,\mathrm{Gpc}^{-3}\mathrm{yr}^{-1}$, the cosmological SGRB rate is a factor of 3.6--18 higher, the r-process rate is a factor of 0.9--4.1 higher, and the rate inferred from Galactic DNSs is a factor of 2.3--5.1 higher than the BNS rate. We discuss how various uncertainties in the inferred rates either alleviate or exacerbate this tension, which point to the various physical processes that can be constrained by such rate comparisons.
Submitted
6 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.05059
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.