AG-2026.04-1325·hep-ph·cross-listed: hep-exhep-latnucl-exnucl-th
Probing QCD instantons using jet correlation observables in proton-proton collisions at the LHC
Authors
- Sayak Guin
- Swagatam Tah
- Nihar Ranjan Sahoo
- Sayantan Sharma
Abstract
Discovery of instantons in colliders will provide experimental evidence for the topological properties of the QCD vacuum. In this work, we propose jet correlation observables that can unambiguously discriminate between instanton-induced processes and perturbative hard scattering events in pp collisions at LHC energies. By calculating the instanton sizes and their separations in 2+1 flavor QCD with physical quark masses, we provide constraints on the center-of-mass energies of the produced hadrons in an instanton-induced process. Our proposal is directly applicable for future ep measurements at the Electron-Ion Collider, offering a cleaner environment to probe instanton-induced processes.
Submitted
22 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.20780
Summary
Physicists propose a new way to spot instantons—exotic quantum tunneling events in QCD—by looking at distinctive patterns in how jets cluster together at the LHC, with predictions tested using realistic quark masses.
- Instantons are rare topological events in the quantum chromodynamics vacuum; this work gives the first practical strategy to find them experimentally using jet correlations as a fingerprint.
- The authors calculated instanton properties using modern QCD simulations with realistic physics, constraining the energy scales where these events should appear at colliders.
- The proposed observables could work even better at the future Electron-Ion Collider, where fewer background processes compete, making instanton detection more feasible.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.