AG-2026.04-1330·hep-ph
Impact of different neutrino decoherence formalisms at the future long-baseline Experiments
Authors
- Rudra Majhi
- Koushik Pal
- Monojit Ghosh
- Rukmani Mohanta
Abstract
In this paper, we have studied the impact of two different formalisms of quantum decoherence in determining the sensitivities of the two future long-baseline experiments DUNE and P2SO. In Formalism-A, we will assume that the decoherence matrix is defined in a matter mass eigenstate basis which is the basis that diagonalizes the Hamiltonian for neutrinos in matter, with a constant matter density. In Formalism-B, we will define the decoherence matrix in the vacuum mass eigenstate basis and then rotate it to matter mass basis via an unitary transformation. By using different values of the decoherence parameter $Γ$, we will show how these two formalisms differ at the probability level and then we will demonstrate how the sensitivities can differ at the $χ^2$ level. Our results show that if the values of $Γ$ is small, then these two formalisms yield same probability in vacuum. However, if the values of $Γ$ is large or if there is strong matter effect, then these two formalisms yield very different results.
Submitted
22 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.20977
Summary
Two ways of modeling quantum decoherence in neutrinos give identical predictions in simple cases but diverge significantly when decoherence is strong or matter effects are pronounced, affecting how well future experiments like DUNE can detect these subtle quantum effects.
- The choice of mathematical framework for decoherence matters: one approach tracks decoherence in the basis that describes neutrinos in Earth's matter, the other in vacuum and then transforms it—a seemingly technical choice that yields identical results only for weak decoherence.
- When decoherence is strong or Earth's matter significantly alters neutrino behavior, the two formalisms produce measurably different predictions, which could shift how sensitive experiments like DUNE are to detecting quantum decoherence.
- This work highlights a hidden ambiguity in how physicists should set up calculations for upcoming neutrino detectors, suggesting that experimenters need to be careful about which formalism they adopt when interpreting their results.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.