AG-2026.04-1340·hep-ph
$γZ$-exchange contribution in elastic $ep$ scattering by perturbative QCD
Authors
- Qian-Qian Guo
- Hui-Yun Cao
- Hai-Qing Zhou
Abstract
In this study, we calculate the $γZ$-exchange contribution to elastic $ep$ scattering at large momentum transfer within perturbative QCD. We present analytical expressions for the $γZ$-exchange contributions to the amplitudes. We also estimate the asymptotic behaviors of the amplitude contributions and of the physical quantity $A_{\text{PV}}$ at high momentum transfer. These asymptotic behaviors determine the subtraction order in the dispersion relations (DRs) satisfied by the amplitudes. We find that the DR usually used in the literature for the axial-vector part of the amplitude is not valid at high $Q^2$ and should be modified to a once-subtracted form. Within the present pQCD framework and the adopted proton distribution amplitudes, these high-energy properties also provide nontrivial constraints on low-energy DR assumptions.
Submitted
23 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.21610
Summary
Physicists calculated how photons and Z bosons exchange energy during high-speed electron-proton collisions, finding that standard mathematical tools used to analyze these collisions need correction at extreme energies.
- The γZ-exchange process—where a photon and Z boson are swapped between particles—contributes measurably to elastic electron-proton scattering and must be accounted for in precision calculations.
- At very high collision energies, the standard dispersion relations (mathematical shortcuts that connect different energy scales) fail for the axial-vector part of the collision amplitude and need to be reformulated.
- High-energy behavior of these collisions constrains assumptions made at low energies, linking distant regimes of physics in a way that tightens predictions across the entire energy spectrum.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.