AG-2026.04-1352·hep-ph·cross-listed: gr-qchep-th
Flux Mixing and CP Violation in QCD
Authors
- Motoo Suzuki
Abstract
We argue that kinetic mixing between topological flux sectors generates an effective shift of the QCD $\barθ$ angle, thereby inducing CP-violating effects. To demonstrate this mechanism, we analyze a $(1+1)$-dimensional $U(1)\times U(1)$ gauge theory as a controlled setting, where kinetic mixing leads to observable shifts in electric fluxes. We then extend the analysis to four dimensions using a three-form field description of QCD coupled to an additional $U(1)$ three-form gauge field. We find that hidden-sector fluxes, through kinetic mixing, shift the effective $θ$ parameter of QCD and induce a nonzero expectation value of $\langle G\tilde{G}\rangle$. We discuss the implications for the strong CP problem and clarify under which conditions standard solutions, such as axion or CP/parity-based mechanisms, are compromised or remain robust.
Submitted
23 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.21970
Summary
Hidden gauge fields can mix with QCD's topological properties through a subtle quantum effect, effectively shifting the parameter that controls matter-antimatter asymmetry in the strong force.
- Kinetic mixing—where different gauge fields influence each other's dynamics—can artificially shift QCD's CP-violating parameter (the θ angle) without explicit fundamental CP violation.
- The authors demonstrate this mechanism first in a simplified 2D toy model, then show it works in realistic 4D QCD using advanced field theory techniques, making the effect concrete and calculable.
- This finding complicates proposed solutions to the strong CP problem (why we don't observe CP violation in the strong force): some popular fixes like axions might not work if hidden sectors are present, while others remain viable depending on model details.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.