AG-2026.04-1354·hep-ph·cross-listed: astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
Cosmic-Ray Signatures of Annihilating and Semi-Annihilating Dark Matter via One-Step Cascades
Authors
- Francesco D'Eramo
- Silvia Manconi
- Tommaso Sassi
Abstract
We present a framework in which three classes of dark matter number-changing processes can affect both the relic abundance via thermal freeze-out in the early universe and the generation of indirect cosmic-ray signals today. These processes are: (i) direct annihilations into Standard Model final states; (ii) annihilations into metastable on-shell mediators that subsequently decay into Standard Model particles; (iii) semi-annihilation processes featuring a dark matter particle in the final state, accompanied by a metastable mediator. A central element of our analysis is the systematic inclusion of semi-annihilation alongside the more commonly considered channels. This setup is largely model-independent, as we only assume the presence of one or more of these processes with unsuppressed $s$-wave contributions. We analyze representative benchmarks for the dominant decay modes of the mediator and show how the resulting injection spectra for $γ$ rays, neutrinos, and cosmic-ray antimatter vary with the relative importance of the three classes of processes. As an application, we evaluate the observable $γ$-ray fluxes from dwarf spheroidal galaxies in the GeV-TeV window. Finally, we provide explicit model realizations in which multiple processes coexist, and discuss how their interplay shapes indirect detection signatures. Our results provide a consistent connection between early-universe dynamics and present-day observables, revealing distinctive features that arise when multiple dark matter processes contribute simultaneously.
Submitted
23 April 20264 days ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.21976
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.