AG-2026.04-1394·hep-th·cross-listed: hep-ph
Smooth Threshold Effects from Dimensional Regularization
Authors
- Yannick Kluth
Abstract
We suggest a non-minimal renormalization scheme based on dimensional regularization that naturally incorporates threshold effects of heavy particles. By renormalizing couplings and masses to subtract all poles in $d \geq 4$, the resulting scheme is mass-dependent and circumvents shortcomings of mass-independent schemes like minimal subtraction. At the same time, many advantages of minimal subtraction such as gauge independence are retained. Through explicit one-loop computations in QCD, we demonstrate that this scheme reduces to minimal subtraction at high energies while providing smooth transitions at particle thresholds and implementing the Appelquist-Carazzone theorem. Potential future applications and extensions are discussed.
Submitted
26 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.23526
Summary
Physicists developed a new mathematical scheme for calculating quantum effects that automatically handles what happens when heavy particles become too massive to create—smoothly transitioning between high-energy and low-energy physics without special adjustments.
- The scheme uses dimensional regularization (a standard quantum calculation trick) but tweaks it to keep track of particle masses, making it mass-dependent rather than mass-independent like the usual minimal subtraction method.
- It reproduces minimal subtraction's clean behavior at high energies while naturally encoding threshold effects—the abrupt changes in particle physics predictions when you cross the energy needed to create a heavy particle.
- One-loop QCD calculations show the scheme implements the Appelquist-Carazzone theorem automatically, meaning heavy particles decouple at low energies, reducing the effective theory without manual intervention.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.