AG-2026.04-1403·hep-th·cross-listed: hep-ph
Bounds on nonlinear effective field theories via resurgent relative entropy
Authors
- Pietro Conzinu
- Daiki Ueda
Abstract
We study nonlinear effective field theories (EFTs) with factorially growing perturbative expansions, focusing on a class in which the relative entropy encodes an infinite tower of higher-dimensional operators. Using the resummed relative entropy, we derive bounds on EFT coefficients: the non-negativity of the resummed relative entropy fixes the sign of their asymptotic growth, while its violation signals instabilities. In fermionic QED, analytic continuation from Euclidean to Minkowski spacetime yields a concrete example: the Schwinger effect, a nonperturbative instability captured by the resummed relative entropy.
Submitted
27 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.24286
Summary
Using a mathematical technique called resurgence, researchers derive constraints on coefficients in quantum field theories whose perturbative expansions grow factorially, and show this method captures real physical instabilities like electron-positron pair creation in strong electric fields.
- Effective field theories often have perturbative expansions that grow so fast they seem nonsensical, but resurgent relative entropy—a measure of disorder that's been resummed to include all terms—can tame this and set rules on theory coefficients.
- The sign of how coefficients grow asymptotically is fixed by requiring the resummed relative entropy to stay non-negative, a physical consistency condition that emerges from thermodynamic principles.
- The framework successfully predicts the Schwinger effect (particle creation in intense electric fields) in fermionic QED, validating that this abstract mathematical constraint captures genuine nonperturbative physics.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.