AG-2026.04-1406·hep-ph
CP violation in $Σ^+\to p\ell^+\ell^-$ within the standard model and beyond
Authors
- Xiao-Gang He
- Jusak Tandean
- German Valencia
Abstract
The LHCb collaboration has recently observed the rare hyperon decay $Σ^+\to pμ^+μ^-$. It can also measure the corresponding antihyperon channel with comparable precision and is thus in a position to extract information on $CP$ violation in this mode. Interestingly, the long-distance contributions that dominate it within the standard model provide large absorptive phases that could drive substantial $CP$ violation through interference with potential new-physics contributions. Here we explore this possibility, finding that the decay rate asymmetry is currently allowed to be as high as tens of percent, which can be probed by LHCb in the near future. We additionally consider the same with regard to the dielectron mode $Σ^+\to pe^+e^-$ as well as the related radiative one $Σ^+\to pγ$.
Submitted
27 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.24335
Summary
A rare decay of the sigma baryon offers a sensitive way to detect CP violation—the asymmetry between matter and antimatter—by comparing decay rates with their mirror images, potentially revealing physics beyond the standard model.
- The sigma-plus decay to a proton and lepton pair produces large quantum interference effects (absorptive phases) in the standard model that could amplify CP-violating signals from new physics.
- The predicted CP asymmetry could reach tens of percent, making it detectable by LHCb experiments in the near future rather than requiring decades of data collection.
- Multiple decay channels (into electrons, muons, and photons) provide complementary windows on the same physics, strengthening the case for discovering deviations from the standard model.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.