AG-2026.04-1410·hep-ph
Energy spectrum of magnetic fields from electroweak symmetry breaking
Authors
- Károly Seller
- Günter Sigl
Abstract
We study the magnetic fields produced in the early Universe during the electroweak symmetry breaking by considering random configurations of an inhomogeneous Higgs field. By exploiting the inherent randomness of the initial configurations the spectrum of the produced magnetic field is essentially analytic, which bypasses the need for costly lattice simulations. On the numerical side, we devise a simulation framework which results in continuous fields capable of resolving the small-scale structure of the fields that was inaccessible for the lattice-based calculation. Finally, by revisiting the effects of statistical isotropy and causality on the spectrum, we define general correlation functions that are then fitted to the simulation data and compared to the analytic results.
Submitted
27 April 20261 month ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.24446
Summary
Researchers calculated how magnetic fields form when the universe undergoes electroweak symmetry breaking by using analytical methods and improved simulations, revealing the detailed structure of these primordial magnetic fields without expensive lattice computations.
- The team exploited the randomness in Higgs field configurations to derive an essentially analytical spectrum, avoiding computationally expensive lattice simulations that have limited resolution.
- They developed a new simulation framework that produces continuous fields able to resolve small-scale magnetic field structures that were invisible to previous lattice-based approaches.
- By carefully applying the constraints of isotropy and causality, they derived general correlation functions that match both their simulations and analytical predictions, providing a more complete picture of primordial magnetism.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.