AG-2026.04-1417·hep-th·cross-listed: gr-qc
Nonlocal-in-time tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian and tenth self-force orders
Authors
- Christoph Dlapa
- Gregor Kälin
- Zhengwen Liu
- Rafael A. Porto
Abstract
Using the worldline effective field theory formalism, we derive the nonlocal-in-time conservative contributions arising from tail effects in gravitational scattering to fifth Post-Minkowskian (5PM) and tenth self-force (10SF) orders. The result features multiple polylogarithms of up to weight three. This challenging computation relies on state-of-the-art integration techniques, including a novel integration-by-parts algorithm: the Sparse Integral Reducer (SpideR). We find perfect agreement in the overlap with all existing literature through sixth post-Newtonian order. The results presented here provide a key ingredient for isolating the local-in-time component of the conservative two-body dynamics of binary inspirals at 5PM order.
Submitted
28 April 20262 weeks ago
Version
v1
License
CC-BY-4.0
DOI
10.48550/arXiv.2604.25916
Summary
Physicists computed how gravitational waves carry away energy in a delayed, nonlocal way during collisions of massive objects, extending predictions to unprecedented precision using new computational tools.
- The calculation reaches 5th Post-Minkowskian order—a major milestone in the analytical prediction of gravitational scattering, pushing well beyond previous limits.
- Tail effects mean a gravitating body 'feels' the influence of its own radiation bouncing back from spacetime curvature, a subtle memory effect that requires sophisticated mathematics (polylogarithms) to describe.
- A new algorithm called SpideR automates the grueling symbolic integration needed for such calculations, making future higher-order results more tractable and supporting improved gravitational-wave models for LIGO-like detectors.
curious · generated by claude-haiku-4-5
Chat with this PDF
Ask questions, probe assumptions, request a plain-English summary. Answers cite sections from the preprint itself.
Community
Questions and answers about this paper from other readers. No formal peer review — just a place to think out loud.